About DNM Links

Who publishes this site

DNM Links is a third-party editorial project. If you are asking who runs dnmlinks, the honest answer is that no named operator, company filing, or contact desk is published here — and we will not invent one. What you can verify is simpler: every profile page is written in the third person, outbound handoffs use an on-site interstitial, and nothing on the site claims to be "the team behind" any listed service. This about dnmlinks page exists so that separation is stated plainly.

The project has carried a 2023–2026 copyright line sitewide, which matches the age of the archive pages and the tutorial library rather than a founding story we cannot document.

What the site actually does

Each indexed entity gets a reference page. Where an address is published, it is shown as plain text with a copy-friendly code block, not as a direct outbound handoff from the body. Status fields — response time, check count, last observed state — come from the same backend record that also feeds per-entity RSS items. When two artifacts agree on a number to three decimals, we treat that as evidence that a check ran, and we print the timestamp that record carries. We do not claim a schedule we cannot show.

Screenshots and static captures on profile pages are editorial assets: they show what a page looked like at capture time, not a live feed. The tutorial library covers wallets, PGP, nodes, and OpSec mechanics in long-form guides. That educational layer is deliberate; a property that only repeated addresses would be useless for readers and brittle for everyone involved.

What we do not do

This is the line readers should not have to guess. DNM Links does not sell products, does not hold escrow, does not process payments, and does not intermediate transactions between visitors and third parties. We do not run any listed service, do not speak for operators, and do not provide customer support on their behalf. If a page here shows an address, that is publication and context — not an invitation routed through us.

We also do not issue trust scores with a hidden rubric. Where older templates still showed numeric ratings, the editorial direction is to remove them unless a published method exists. A check record can be factual; a /10 score without criteria is not.

How to read a profile page

Treat every published address as untrusted until you verify it yourself. Compare the string against signed statements from the operator when those exist, use Tor Browser with its security settings intact, and assume that a seized or defunct entry can remain on the open web as a phishing trap. Our interstitial exists to slow you down, not to vouch for the destination.

When this site labels something "verified," it should mean a named check on a named date — not a blanket guarantee of safety. If a page does not show what was checked, treat the label as stale marketing copy and verify independently.

Corrections and limits

We correct factual errors when they are reported and confirmed against the underlying record. We do not promise same-day turnaround because no staffed support desk is advertised here. For privacy practices see the privacy policy; for liability framing see the site disclaimer.